Salt sensitivity of the vegetative and reproductive stages in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Podding is a particularly sensitive stage

Samineni, S and Siddique, K H M and Gaur, P M and Colmer, T D (2011) Salt sensitivity of the vegetative and reproductive stages in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Podding is a particularly sensitive stage. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71. pp. 260-268. ISSN 0098-8472

PDF - Published Version Restricted to ICRISAT users only Download (476kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Soil salinity is an increasing problem, including in regions of the world where chickpea is cultivated. Salt sensitivity of chickpea was evaluated at both the vegetative and reproductive phase. Root-zone salinity treatments of 0, 20, 40 and 60mM NaCl in aerated nutrient solution were applied to seedlings or to older plants at the time of flower bud initiation. Even the reputedly tolerant cultivar JG11 was sensitive to salinity. Plants exposed to 60mM NaCl since seedlings, died by 52 d without producing any pods; at 40mM NaCl plants died by 75 d with few pods formed; and at 20mM NaCl plants had 78–82% dry mass of controls, with slightly higher flower numbers but 33% less pods. Shoot Cl exceeded shoot Na by 2–5 times in both the vegetative and reproductive phase, and these ions also entered the flowers. Conversion of flowers into pods was sensitive to NaCl. Pollen from salinized plants was viable, but addition of 40mM NaCl to an in vitro medium severely reduced pollen germination and tube growth. Plants recovered when NaCl was removed at flower bud initiation, adding new vegetative growth and forming flowers, pods and seeds. Our results demonstrate that chickpea is sensitive to salinity at both the vegetative and reproductive phase, with pod formation being particularly sensitive. Thus, future evaluations of salt tolerance in chickpea need to be conducted at both the vegetative and reproductive stages.

Item Type:	Article
Divisions:	UNSPECIFIED
CRP:	UNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Abiotic stress; Tissue sodium; Tissue chloride; Salinity tolerance; Pollen viability; Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Subjects:	Mandate crops > Chickpea
Depositing User:	Siva Shankar
Date Deposited:	17 May 2011 05:45
Last Modified:	30 Jun 2017 07:35
URI:	http://oar.icrisat.org/id/eprint/9
Official URL:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.12.014
Projects:	UNSPECIFIED
Funders:	Australian Research Council, Council of Grain Growers Organizations(Western Australia), Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR)
Acknowledgement:	We thank Neil Turner (CLIMA, UWA) and Vincent Vadez (ICRISAT) for comments on a draft of this manuscript. Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) for supporting S.S. with a PhD scholarship through the Endeavour Postgraduate Award. We thank the Australian Research Council (ARC) and Council of Grain Growers Association (COGGO) for operating funds for this research via ARC Linkage Project LP0776586.
Links:	Google Scholar

View Statistics

Actions (login required)

View Item