Improving water productivity in the Australian Grains industry—a nationally coordinated approach

Kirkegaard, J A and Hunt, J R and McBeath, T M and Lilley, J M and Moore, A and Robertson, M and Oliver, Y and Ward, P R and Milroy, S and Whitbread, A M (2014) Improving water productivity in the Australian Grains industry—a nationally coordinated approach. Crop & Pasture Science, 65 (07). pp. 583-601. ISSN 1836-0947

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to ICRISAT users only

Download (908kB) | Request a copy


Improving the water-limited yield of dryland crops and farming systems has been an underpinning objective of research within the Australian grains industry since the concept was defined in the 1970s. Recent slowing in productivity growth has stimulated a search for new sources of improvement, but few previous research investments have been targeted on a national scale. In 2008, the Australian grains industry established the 5-year, AU$17.6 million, Water Use Efficiency (WUE) Initiative, which challenged growers and researchers to lift WUE of grain-based production systems by 10%. Sixteen regional grower research teams distributed across southern Australia (300–700 mm annual rainfall) proposed a range of agronomic management strategies to improve water-limited productivity. A coordinating project involving a team of agronomists, plant physiologists, soil scientists and system modellers was funded to provide consistent understanding and benchmarking of water-limited yield, experimental advice and assistance, integrating system science and modelling, and to play an integration and communication role. The 16 diverse regional project activities were organised into four themes related to the type of innovation pursued (integrating break-crops, managing summer fallows, managing in-season water-use, managing variable and constraining soils), and the important interactions between these at the farm-scale were explored and emphasised. At annual meetings, the teams compared the impacts of various management strategies across different regions, and the interactions from management combinations. Simulation studies provided predictions of both a priori outcomes that were tested experimentally and extrapolation of results across sites, seasons and up to the whole-farm scale. We demonstrated experimentally that potential exists to improve water productivity at paddock scale by levels well above the 10% target by better summer weed control (37–140%), inclusion of break crops (16–83%), earlier sowing of appropriate varieties (21–33%) and matching N supply to soil type (91% on deep sands). Capturing synergies from combinations of pre- and in-crop management could increase wheat yield at farm scale by 11–47%, and significant on-farm validation and adoption of some innovations has occurred during the Initiative. An ex post economic analysis of the Initiative estimated a benefit : cost ratio of 3.7 : 1, and an internal return on investment of 18.5%. We briefly review the structure and operation of the initiative and summarise some of the key strategies that emerged to improve WUE at paddock and farm-scale.

Item Type: Article
Divisions: RP-Resilient Dryland Systems
CRP: CGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems
Uncontrolled Keywords: Drought, Dryland farming, Fallow, Rotation, Water-use efficiency, Wheat, Australia, Grains industry
Subjects: Others
Depositing User: Mr Ramesh K
Date Deposited: 28 Apr 2016 08:00
Last Modified: 28 Apr 2016 08:00
Official URL:
Acknowledgement: We acknowledge the GRDC for funding the National Water-Use Efficiency Initiative, and for the vision of its senior managers and panel members in developing the proposal. In particular, we thank Mr Stuart Kearns (manager) for his confidence, flexibility and practical support of the CSIRO CSP00111 coordination team, which was so crucial to our role. We especially thank the 16 regional teams whose ideas and passion formed the platform on which the Initiative was built, and whose ongoing efforts will ensure continued impact. We specifically thank Mr Jeremy Lemon, DAFWA, for assistance in reporting the work on gypsum application, Mr Simon Craig and Ms Claire Browne from BCG for the provision of break-crop adoption and response data, Dr Neil Fettell for provision of summer fallow grazing data, and Mr Nick Poole and Mr Adam Inchbold for provision of row spacing response data. Drs Rick Llewellyn and John Passioura provided helpful comments on the manuscript.
View Statistics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item