"9936","12","archive","1305",,,"disk0/00/00/99/36","2017-04-03 03:34:46","2017-04-03 03:34:46","2017-04-03 03:34:46","article",,,"show",,,,"","","","","","","","","","",,,,"Verkaart","S","","","","","","","Verkaart","S","","","","",,,,,"","",,,,,"","","ICRISAT (Nairobi)","Kenya","Welfare impacts of improved chickpea adoption: A pathway for rural development in Ethiopia?","pub","s1.1","CRPS5","","public",,,"Improved chickpea; Technology adoption; Poverty; Control function; Ethiopia; Chickpea",,"We are grateful to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, ICRISAT
and the Netherlands Junior Professional Officer (JPO) program
for the financial support of this study. We thank the Debre Zeit
Agricultural Research Center (DZARC) of the Ethiopian Institute
of Agricultural Research (EIAR) for implementing the household
surveys. Erwin Bulte, Kees Burger, Ken Giller and Anna Josephson
provided useful comments on the paper. We are responsible for
any remaining mistakes.","We analyse the impact of improved chickpea adoption on welfare in Ethiopia using three rounds of panel data. First, we estimate the determinants of improved chickpea adoption using a double hurdle model. We apply a control function approach with correlated random effects to control for possible endogeneity resulting from access to improved seed and technology transfer activities. To instrument for these variables we develop novel distance weighted measures of a household’s neighbours’ access to improved seed and technology transfer activities. Second, we estimate the impact of area under improved chickpea cultivation on household income and poverty. We apply a fixed effects instrumental variables approach where we use the predicted area under cultivation from the double hurdle model as an instrument for observed area under cultivation. We find that improved chickpea adoption significantly increases household income while also reducing household poverty. Finally, we disaggregate results by landholding to explore whether the impact of adoption has heterogeneous effects. Adoption favoured all but the largest landholders, for who the new technology did not have a significant impact on income. Overall, increasing access to improved chickpea appears a promising pathway for rural development in Ethiopia’s chickpea growing regions.","2017-01","published",,"Food Policy","66",,"Elsevier",,"50-61",,,,,,"10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.007",,,,,"TRUE",,"0306-9192",,,,,,"","http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.007","https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?q=Welfare+impacts+of+improved+chickpea+adoption%3A+A+pathway+for+rural+development+in+Ethiopia%3F&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5","pub",,"Open Access funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation","",,,,,,"",,,,,,,"",,,,,"",,,,,"","",,,,,"","",,,,,
"9936",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"Munyua","B G","","",,,,,"Munyua","B G","","",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"Development Economics Group, Wageningen University & Research (Wageningen)","The Netherlands",,,"s11",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"9936",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"Mausch","K","","",,,,,"Mausch","K","","",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois (Illinois)","USA",,,"s28",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"9936",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"Michler","J D","","",,,,,"Michler","J D","","",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ICRISAT (Bulawayo)","Zimbabwe",,,"s54",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,