<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Identifying determinants, pressures and trade-offs of crop residue use in mixed smallholder farms in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">D</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Valbuena</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Homann-Kee Tui</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">O</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Erenstein</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">N</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Teufel</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">A</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Duncan</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">T</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Abdoulaye</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">B</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Swain</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">K</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Mekonnen</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">I</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Germaine</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">B</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Gérard</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Crop residues (CR) have become a limited resource in mixed crop-livestock farms. As a result of the&#13;
increasing demand and low availability of alternative resources, CR became an essential resource for&#13;
household activities, especially for livestock keeping; a major livelihood element of smallholder farmers&#13;
in the developing world. Farmers’ decisions on CR use are determined by farmers’ preferences, total crop&#13;
production, availability of alternative resources and demand for CR. Interaction of these determinants can&#13;
result in pressures and trade-offs of CR use. Determinants, pressures and trade-offs are shaped by the specific&#13;
socio-economic and agro-ecological context of these mixed farms. The objective of this paper is to&#13;
provide a comparative analysis of the determinants of CR use and to examine some options to cope with&#13;
pressures and trade-offs in 12 study sites across Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Drawing on socioeconomic&#13;
data at household and village level, we describe how cereal intensification and livestock feed&#13;
demand influence use, pressures and trade-offs of CR use across study sites, specifically cereal residue.&#13;
Our results show that in low cereal production and livestock feed demand sites, despite a low demand&#13;
for CR and availability of alternative biomass, pressures and trade-offs of CR use are common particularly&#13;
in the dry season. In sites with moderate cereal production, and low–moderate and moderate livestock&#13;
feed demand, alternative biomass resources are scarce and most residues are fed to livestock or used&#13;
to cover household needs. Subsequently, pressures and potential trade-offs are stronger. In sites with&#13;
low cereal production and high livestock feed demand, pressures and trade-offs depend on the availability&#13;
of better feed resources. Finally, sites with high cereal production and high livestock feed demand&#13;
have been able to fulfil most of the demand for CR, limiting pressures and trade-offs. These patterns show&#13;
that agricultural intensification, better management of communal resources and off-farm activities are&#13;
plausible development pathways to overcome pressures and trade-offs of CR use. Although technologies&#13;
can largely improve these trends, research and development should revisit past initiatives so as to&#13;
develop innovative approaches to tackle the well-known problem of low agricultural production in many&#13;
smallholder mixed systems, creating more sustainable futures.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Agriculture-Farming, Production, Technology, Economics</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2015</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Elsevier</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>