OAR@ICRISATUnscrambling confounded effects of sowing date trials to screen for crop adaptation to high temperatureV OSadrasaauthorVVadezauthorRPurushothamanauthorLLakeauthorHMarrouauthorAgainst the backdrop of climate change, genotypes with improved adaptation to elevated temperature are required; reliable screening methods are therefore important. Sowing date experiments are a practical and in expensive approach for comparison of large collections of lines. Late-sown crops usually experience hotter conditions and phenotypes thus partially capture this environmental influence. Two sets of confounded factors, however, limit the value of sowing date trials. First, daily mean temperature correlates with both minimum and maximum temperature, photoperiod, radiation and vapour pressure deficit, and it may also correlate with rainfall. Second, temperature alters the genotype-dependent phen-ology of crops, effectively shifting the timing and duration of critical periods against the background of temperature and other environmental variables.Here we advance a crop-level framework to unscramble the confounded effects of sowing date experiments; it is based on four physiological concepts: (1) annual crops accommodate environmen-tal variation through seed number rather than seed size; (2) seed number is most responsive to the environment in species-specific critical windows; (3) non-stressful thermal effects affecting seed set through development and canopy size can be integrated in a photothermal quotient relating intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and mean temperature during the critical window; (4) stressful temperature reduces yield by disrupting reproduction.The framework was tested in a factorial experiment combining four chickpea varieties with puta-tively contrasting adaptation to thermal stress and five environments resulting from the combination of seasons and sowing dates. Yield ranged from 13 to 577 g m−2. Shifts in phenology led to contrasting photothermal conditions in the critical window between flowering and 400◦C d after flowering that were specific for each variety–environment combination. The photothermal quotient ranged from 2.72to 6.85 MJ m−2 ◦C−1; it explained 50% of the variation in yield and maximum temperature explained 32% of the remaining variation. Thus, half of the variation in yield was associated with developmental,non-stressful thermal effect and (at most) 16% of the variation was attributable to thermal stress. Thephotothermal quotient corrected by vapour pressure deficit accounted for by 75% of the variation in yieldand provided further insight on photosynthesis-mediated responses to temperature.Crop adaptation to non-stressful, developmental thermal effects and stressful temperatures disrupting reproduction involve different physiological processes and requires partially different agronomic and breeding solutions. Our analytical approach partially separates these effects, adds value to sowing datetrials, and is likely to return more robust rankings of varietiesClimate Change2015ElsevierArticle

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant OAR@ICRISAT the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that OAR@ICRISAT does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at OAR@ICRISAT) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.