<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Global Climate Change Agenda and Processes: Scouting for Traditional Grassroot Adaptation Strategies in Arid and Semi-Arid Agriculture of India. Working Paper Series No. 46</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">N S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Jodha</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">N P</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Singh</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">M C S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Bantilan</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">K.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Byjesh</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The paper attempts to explore how a global Climate Change agenda and processes (covering&#13;
concerns, debates, negotiations, research-based projections, impacts and actions broadly&#13;
collectively termed as “global discourse” in this paper), can help enhance the farmers’&#13;
adaptations against impacts of climate change in arid and semi-arid regions of India, which is&#13;
potentially more vulnerable to climate change.&#13;
After a brief introduction to these dryland agricultural regions, the paper looks at the main&#13;
thrusts of largely macro level focused global discourse on climate change. This is followed by&#13;
a discussion on relevant features of farmers’ traditional adaptation strategies against climatic&#13;
variability in the above-mentioned regions captured through longitudinal village level studies by&#13;
ICRISAT, and supplemented by other studies focused on farmer responses to weather induced&#13;
risks. Based on the above, we look at the extent of match or mismatch between the two to&#13;
identify the limitations and potential of the macro-level global discourse on climate change, for&#13;
enhancing farmers’ adaptation strategies against the negative impacts of climate change.&#13;
Information on mainstream global discourse is picked up from a variety of reviews and critiques&#13;
of the specific components of global discourse on climate change. The information on farmers’&#13;
adaptation strategies is provided by a number of studies on farmers’ vulnerability and risk&#13;
management conducted during the last thirty years in different parts of arid and semi-arid areas&#13;
in India.&#13;
The important concerns about usability of global discourse relate to highly aggregative and&#13;
macro level focused information, projections, modeled scenarios, etc, along with their current&#13;
information gaps and uncertainties. Consequently, they do not offer apparent concrete contexts&#13;
at micro levels to which dryland farmers respond by way of adaptation measures. Besides, the&#13;
global discourse largely focus on mitigation as against adaptation to climate change, which&#13;
does not help dryland farmers’ adaptations to climate change. Finally, the farmers’ adaptationresponses&#13;
are not directed exclusively to weather induced risks and uncertainties, but they&#13;
address the other sources of risks such as market and other calamities. Since the global&#13;
discourse on climate change has highly skewed perspectives (reflected by its focus mainly on&#13;
climate change with little attention to other linked global changes), it may not offer inspiring&#13;
lead lines, even in the perspective sense to dryland farmers to evolve holistic coping strategies&#13;
against risks.&#13;
Based on the evidence and understanding of farmers’ traditional and present adaptation&#13;
strategies against weather variability, the paper attempts to explore some indicative possibilities&#13;
to benefit from macro level global discourse on climate change. They include the indicative&#13;
approaches to harmonize the elements of traditional adaptation approaches and potential field&#13;
oriented (micro level focused) new approaches guided by imperatives of climate change, using&#13;
new technological and institutional options. Their involved facilitative interventions, however,&#13;
are largely product policy programs initiated and promoted by the governments. In some way,&#13;
one of the most significant contributions of global discourse on climate change is generating&#13;
information and concerns of policy makers about potential risks created by climate change and&#13;
need for promoting measures against them including the above-mentioned interventions, which&#13;
2&#13;
ultimately help in making development steps climate sensitive. However, promotion of such&#13;
steps will be greatly facilitated if some downscaling of current global approaches, by way of&#13;
focusing on regional and local/landscape situations, is promoted.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Agriculture-Farming, Production, Technology, Economics</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Climate Change</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2013</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Monograph</mods:genre></mods:mods>