<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Sources of Agricultural Growth in Andhra Pradesh, India:&#13;
Scope for Small Farmer Participation</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">A A</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Reddy</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Andhra Pradesh (AP) is one of the largest states in India, with agriculture providing the major&#13;
source of income for about 60 per cent of the population even though it contributes only 19&#13;
per cent state GDP. In the last 40 years, annual growth rate of agriculture is 2.88 per cent as&#13;
against targetted growth of about 4 per cent per annum. This paper analyses the sources of&#13;
crop sub-sector growth in pre-liberalisation period (from 1970-1989) and post-liberalisation&#13;
period (from 1990-2009). The growth rate in value of production in pre-liberalisation period&#13;
is lower (2.4% per annum) than post-liberalisation period (2.7% per annum) per annum. Even&#13;
though contribution of both yield and crop diversification to growth in value of production&#13;
is higher, the negative contribution of real prices is the main reason for slower growth in preliberalisation&#13;
period. While positive contribution of prices along with yield and diversification&#13;
in the post-liberalisation period contributed for higher growth rate. In the post-liberalisation&#13;
period, regions are specialising based on their resource endowment (coastal Andhra in paddy,&#13;
Telangana in cotton and Rayalaseema in groundnut), even though all the regions show general&#13;
tendency of diversification towards high value crops (HVCs) like fruits and vegetables. The&#13;
paper highlights that the small farmer’s participation in diversification towards HVCs (HVCs;&#13;
fruits, vegetables, spices, cotton and sugarcane) is limited, but they adopted the yield&#13;
increasing technology components like high yielding varieties (HYVs), irrigation and cropping&#13;
intensity compared to large farmers. As a result gross and net returns per ha are higher among&#13;
small farms. This might have positive effect on small farmers (&lt;2.0 ha) who comprise 86 per&#13;
cent of the total farm households, and cultivate, on average, half a hectare of land. The paper&#13;
also demonstrates that there is positive association between reduction of poverty and area&#13;
under HVCs. Agricultural diversification in favour of HVCs that generate larger returns and&#13;
are labour-intensive, which are demand driven to be explored for the benefit of small farmers.&#13;
In many agricultural development indicators, coastal Andhra is better positioned followed by&#13;
Telangana and Rayalaseema.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Agriculture-Farming, Production, Technology, Economics</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2011</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Academic Foundation</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>