<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Cost Effectiveness of Rainwater Harvesting for Groundwater&#13;
Recharge in Micro-Watersheds of Kolar District of India: The Case&#13;
Study of Thotli Micro-Watershed</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">N</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Nagaraj</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">U</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Pradhani</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">P G</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Chengappa</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">G</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Basavaraj</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">R</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Kanwar</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This study has estimated the supply augmentation of groundwater recharge due to creation of water&#13;
harvesting structures and has assessed the cost-effectiveness of rainwater harvesting for groundwater&#13;
recharge on watershed basis in one of the sub-watersheds of the Kolar district, Peninsular India — a&#13;
typically hard-rock area. The study is based on the primary data for the year 2008-09 collected from a&#13;
sample of 90 farmers having irrigation bore-wells in the selected watershed named Thotli. The study has&#13;
indicated that the annual draft of irrigation water exceeds the annual recharge, causing a negative balance.&#13;
On an average, the returns per rupee investment have been found to be ` 1.80 on farm pond, ` 1.78 on&#13;
recharge pit and ` 1.39 on field bund. The cost incurred to impound a metre cube of water has been found&#13;
as ` 3.01 in the case of field bund, where estimated recharge benefit is 5.6 m3, ` 1.67 /m3 in the case of&#13;
recharge pit (with an estimated recharge benefit of 720 m3), and ` 1.33 /m3 in the case of farm pond (recharge&#13;
benefit of 1350 m3). The discounted cost-benefit analysis of the investment on water harvesting structures&#13;
has indicated that the investment on water harvesting structures is cost-effective and financially-viable.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Watershed Management</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2011</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Agricultural Economics Research Association</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>