<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Recovery Of Endosulfan From Pigeonpea, Chickpea, And Groundnut After Spraying With Different Appliances</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">C S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Pawar</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The recovery from pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan], chickpea [Cicer arietinum] and groundnut following application of endosulfan at 1.16 g a.i./m² with a hand-operated knapsack sprayer (500 litres spray liquid/ha), a motorized knapsack sprayer (250 litres/ha) and a hand-held spinning disc controlled droplet applicator (CDA) (10 litres/ha) were determined in studies in Andhra Pradesh, India. The percentage recovery of endosulfan on all crops was higher with the CDA (79-85%) than with the motorized knapsack (60-73%) or the hand-held knapsack (38-57%).&#13;
&#13;
</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Chickpea</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Pigeonpea</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Groundnut</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">1990</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Plant Protection Association of India</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>