<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Comparing multivariate regression and artificial neural network to predict barley production from soil characteristics in northern Iran</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Ayoubi</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">K L</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Sahrawat</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models were designed to predict the&#13;
biomass and grain yield of barley from soil properties; and the performance of&#13;
ANN models was compared with earlier tested statistical models based on&#13;
multivariate regression. Barley yield data and surface soil samples (0–30 cm&#13;
depth) were collected from 1 m2 plots at 112 selected points in the arid region&#13;
of northern Iran. ANN yield models gave higher coefficient of determination and&#13;
lower root mean square error compared to the multivariate regression, indicating&#13;
that ANN is a more powerful tool than multivariate regression. Sensitivity&#13;
analysis showed that soil electrical conductivity, sodium absorption ratio, pH,&#13;
total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and organic matter consistently influenced&#13;
barley biomass and grain yield. A comparison of the two methods to identify the&#13;
most important factors indicated that while in the ANN analysis, soil organic&#13;
matter (SOM) was included among the most important factors; SOM was&#13;
excluded from the most important factors in the multivariate analysis. This&#13;
significant discrepancy between the two methods was apparently a consequence&#13;
of the non-linear relationships of SOM with other soil properties. Overall, our&#13;
results indicated that the ANN models could explain 93 and 89% of the total&#13;
variability in barley biomass and grain yield, respectively. The performance of the&#13;
ANN models as compared to multivariate regression has better chance for&#13;
predicting yield, especially when complex non-linear relationships exist among&#13;
the factors. We suggest that for further potential improvement in predicting&#13;
the barley yield, factors other than the soil properties considered such as soil&#13;
micronutrient status and soil and crop management practices followed during the&#13;
growing season, need to be included in the models.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Soil Science</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2011</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>