<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Assessing impacts of agricultural water interventions in the Kothapally watershed, Southern India</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">K K</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Garg</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">L</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Karlberg</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">J</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Barron</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S P</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Wani</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">J</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Rockstroma</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The paper describes a hydrological model for agricultural water intervention in a community watershed at Kothapally in India,&#13;
developed through integrated management and a consortium approach. The impacts of various soil and water management&#13;
interventions in the watershed are compared to no-intervention during a 30-year simulation period by application of the&#13;
calibrated and validated ARCSWAT 2005 (Version 2.1.4a) modelling tool. Kothapally receives, on average, 800 mm rainfall&#13;
in the monsoon period. 72% of total rainfall is converted as evaporation and transpiration (ET), 20% is stored by groundwater&#13;
aquifer, and 8% exported as outflow from the watershed boundary in current water interventions. ET, groundwater recharge&#13;
and outflow under no-intervention conditions are found to be 64, 9, and 19%, respectively. Check dams helped in storing water&#13;
for groundwater recharge, which can be used for irrigation, as well minimising soil loss. In situ water management practices&#13;
improved the infiltration capacity and water holding capacity of the soil, which resulted in increased water availability by&#13;
10–30% and better crop yields compared to no-intervention. Water outflows from the developed watershed were more than&#13;
halved compared to no-intervention, indicating potentially large negative downstream impacts if these systems were to be&#13;
implemented on a larger scale. On the other hand, in the watershed development program, sediment loads to the streams&#13;
were less than one-tenth. It can be concluded that the hydrological impacts of large-scale implementation of agricultural water&#13;
interventions are significant. They result in improved rain-fed agriculture and improved productivity and livelihood of farmers&#13;
in upland areas while also addressing the issues of poverty, equity, and gender in watersheds. There is a need for case-specific&#13;
studies of such hydrological impacts along with other impacts in terms of equity, gender, sustainability, and development at&#13;
the mesoscale.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Watershed Management</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2011</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>John Wiley &amp; Sons</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>