<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>A conservative pattern of water use, rather than deep or&#13;
profuse rooting, is critical for the terminal drought tolerance&#13;
of chickpea</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">M</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Zaman-Allah</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">D M</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Jenkinson</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">V</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Vadez</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Chickpea is mostly grown on stored soil moisture, and deep/profuse rooting has been hypothesized for almost three&#13;
 decades to be critical for improving chickpea tolerance to terminal drought. However, temporal patterns of water&#13;
use that leave water available for reproduction and grain filling could be equally critical. Therefore, variation in water&#13;
use pattern and root depth/density were measured, and their relationships to yield tested under fully irrigated and&#13;
terminal drought stress, using lysimeters that provided soil volumes equivalent to field conditions. Twenty chickpea&#13;
genotypes having similar plant phenology but contrasting for a field-derived terminal drought-tolerance index based&#13;
 on yield were used. The pattern of water extraction clearly discriminated tolerant and sensitive genotypes. Tolerant&#13;
genotypes had a lower water uptake and a lower index of stomatal conductance at the vegetative stage than&#13;
sensitive ones, while tolerant genotypes extracted more water than sensitive genotypes after flowering. The&#13;
magnitude of the variation in root growth components (depth, length density, RLD, dry weight, RDW) did not&#13;
distinguish tolerant from sensitive genotypes. The seed yield was not significantly correlated with the root length&#13;
density (RLD) in any soil layers, whereas seed yield was both negatively related to water uptake between 23–38 DAS,&#13;
and positively related to water uptake between 48–61 DAS. Under these conditions of terminal drought, the most&#13;
critical component of tolerance in chickpea was the conservative use of water early in the cropping cycle, explained&#13;
partly by a lower canopy conductance, which resulted in more water available in the soil profile during reproduction&#13;
leading to higher reproductive success.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Chickpea</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2011</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Oxford University Press</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>