eprintid: 3159
rev_number: 12
eprint_status: archive
userid: 6
dir: disk0/00/00/31/59
datestamp: 2011-10-24 05:39:40
lastmod: 2012-01-02 07:48:53
status_changed: 2011-10-24 05:39:40
type: conference_item
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: Library-ICRISAT@CGIAR.ORG
item_issues_count: 0
creators_name: Rusinamhodzi, L
creators_name: Corbeels, M
creators_name: Wijk, M T Van
creators_name: Nyamangara, J
creators_name: Giller, K E
icrisatcreators_name: Nyamangara, J
affiliation: CIAT-TSBF(Harare)
affiliation: CIRAD-Annual Cropping Systems(Planaltina)
affiliation: Wageningen University(Wageningen)
affiliation: ICRISAT(Bulawayo)
country: Zimbabwe
country: Brazil
country: Netherlands
title: Effects of Conservation Agriculture and manure application on maize grain yield and soil organic carbon: a comparative analysis
ispublished: pub
subjects: s2.4
full_text_status: public
pres_type: paper
keywords: continuous maize cropping, degraded soil, animal feed, mulch cover, tradeoffs
abstract: In southern Africa, most farming systems exhibit a close integration of crop and livestock components, with an output of one component being an input of the other. The allocation of crop residues for livestock feed meets two out of three critical objectives; it ensures feed during the dry season (De Leeuw, 1996), improves quantity and quality of manure to restore soil fertility (Murwira et al., 1995) but does not ensure permanent soil cover required under conservation agriculture (CA). Thus under CA, there are strong trade-offs for either allocating crop residues for livestock feed or using the crop residues directly for mulch thereby reducing the amount and quality of manure available and compromising the condition of livestock. The objective of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of maize grain yield and soil organic carbon (SOC) changes in CA systems versus conventional tillage systems with manure application. Crop residue retention and reduced tillage are options that are expected to increase SOC in the long-term, in a similar way to manure application. Therefore, it is necessary to perform a comparative analysis to quantify the differences and to identify the most sustainable system. Crop yield is important for ensuring food security and income, and SOC is an important determinant of soil fertility, productivity and sustainability (Lal, 1997).
date: 2011
date_type: published
pagerange: 268-269
event_title: Resilient Food Systems for a Changing World: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress of Conservation Agriculture incorporating 3rd Farming Systems Design Conference
event_location: Brisbane, Australia
event_dates: 26-29 September 2011
event_type: conference
refereed: TRUE
related_url_url: http://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?as_q=Effects+of+Conservation+Agriculture+and+manure+application+on+maize+grain+yield+and+soil+organic+carbon%3A+a+comparative+analysis&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publi
related_url_type: author
citation:   Rusinamhodzi, L and Corbeels, M and Wijk, M T Van and Nyamangara, J and Giller, K E  (2011) Effects of Conservation Agriculture and manure application on maize grain yield and soil organic carbon: a comparative analysis.  In: Resilient Food Systems for a Changing World: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress of Conservation Agriculture incorporating 3rd Farming Systems Design Conference, 26-29 September 2011, Brisbane, Australia.     
document_url: http://oar.icrisat.org/3159/1/EffectsOfConservationAgricultureAndManure268-269.pdf