<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Interaction between host plant resistance and biological activity of Bacillus&#13;
thuringiensis in managing the pod borer Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">V</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Surekha Devi</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">H C</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Sharma</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">P</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Arjuna Rao</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The legume pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has developed&#13;
high levels of resistance to conventional insecticides, and therefore, efforts are being made to develop&#13;
transgenic chickpea expressing toxin genes from the bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) for controlling&#13;
this pest. However, there is an apprehension that acid exudates in chickpea might interfere with biological&#13;
activity of Bt. Therefore, we studied the biological activity of Bt (BiolepR) on four chickpea genotypes&#13;
with different levels of resistance to H. armigera under field conditions, and by incorporating lyophilized&#13;
lead and pod tissue into the artificial diet with and without Bt. The pH of the acid exudates varied from&#13;
2.1 to 2.90, and malic and oxalic acid were the major components of the acid exudates in different&#13;
chickpea genotypes. There was no survival of H. armigera larvae in chickpea plants spayed with 0.1, 0.2&#13;
and 0.5% of Bt. There was a significant reduction in larval survival, larval and pupal weights and&#13;
fecundity, and prolongation of larval and pupal periods in chickpea plots sprayed with Bt (0.05%) as&#13;
compared to the unsprayed plants. Biological activity of Bt was lower on artificial diets with leaf or pod&#13;
powder of chickpea genotypes, which might be because of a low intake of Bt toxins due to antifeedant&#13;
effects of acid exudates in the chickpea or reduction in biological activity of Bt due to the interaction of&#13;
biochemical constituents in chickpea with the Bt toxins. Larval survival, larval and pupal weights,&#13;
pupation and adult emergence were significantly lower on diets with leaf or pod powder of the H.&#13;
armigera-resistant genotypes than on the susceptible check. Chickpea genotypes with resistance to H.&#13;
armigera acted in concert with Bt to cause adverse effects on the survival and development of this insect.&#13;
The results suggested that development of transgenic chickpeas expressing toxin genes form Bt will be&#13;
quite effective for controlling of the pod borer, H. armigera.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Chickpea</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2011</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Elsevier</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>