<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Technology, infrastructure and enterprise trade-off: Strengthening smallholder farming systems in Tamil Nadu State of India for sustainable income and food security</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">R J</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Varadan</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Mamidanna</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">K</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Shalander</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S K Z</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Ahmed</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">I</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Jaisankar</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The complexities of smallholder farming systems pose a challenge in demonstrating the potential benefits or risks of new&#13;
technologies and policies. Using Integrated Analysis Tool, a rule-based dynamic simulation model, this study tried to&#13;
improve the performance of major farming systems in the Tamil Nadu State of India. Amongst the four major farming&#13;
systems viz. Black gram-based (BFS), Paddy-based (PFS), and Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) in Villupuram district&#13;
and Dryland Farming System (DFS) in Virudhunagar district, IFS was found to be the most profitable and resilient&#13;
based on their performance simulated for a 3-year rotation. Setting IFS as a benchmark, potential interventions were evaluated&#13;
under other farming systems to improve their relative performance. The analysis allowed understanding the interactions&#13;
in smallholder farming systems and the potential impact of interventions in a whole farm way considering the cash&#13;
flows, cost intensity, and input-output trade-offs. While multi-bloom technology in black gram increased the net profit of&#13;
BFS without much stress on input and labour, area expansion under rainfed groundnut incurred high expenditure.&#13;
Trading-off paddy with maize and groundnut significantly increased the net profit of PFS but replacing sugarcane with&#13;
tapioca and turmeric was not remunerative. Improved livestock management practices have substantially increased the&#13;
net profit of DFS wherein crop yield could not be enhanced substantially without the prospects of good irrigation infrastructure.&#13;
The irrigation endowed PFS has achieved 90% performance, whereas the water-starved BFS and DFS could&#13;
achieve only 65% performance of IFS. We conclude that agricultural policy must not only focus on potential interventions&#13;
that are profitable but also consider what is acceptable to the farmer, considering synergies and trade-offs between competing&#13;
resources at the farm level.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Smallholder Farmers</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Sustainable Agriculture</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Food Security</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2022</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Sage Publications</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>