<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Weathering the storm or storming the norms? Moving gender equality forward in climate-resilient agriculture</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Huyer</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Partey</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Much is known about the effects of climate change on women, and most research on the topic&#13;
focuses on women’s greater vulnerability as a result of their reliance on natural resources,&#13;
lower access to resources and information, and gender and social norms which inhibit their&#13;
ability to take action and participate in making household and community decisions. Less&#13;
attention is given to women’s active role as agents of change, their knowledge and capacity to&#13;
respond to climate impacts, or tackling of the causes of vulnerability (Dankelman 2010;&#13;
MacGregor 2010; Perez et al. 2015; Huyer et al. 2015). In the area of agricultural climate&#13;
adaptation, Davidson (2016) noted that research on gender has primarily focused on barriers to&#13;
adaptation for women to date, finding that women-headed farming households tend to be more&#13;
vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, and women in all types of households are&#13;
relatively more vulnerable as well.Women farmers are less likely to adopt adaptation strategies&#13;
due to financial and resource limitations and less control over land (see Jost et al. 2016; McKinley et al. 2018; Mishra and Pede 2017), while agricultural organizations tend to exclude&#13;
female farmers from many of the benefits of extension, including access to information, tools,&#13;
seed, fertilizers, and improved livestock. Davidson concludes that as a result, women are often&#13;
excluded from participation in adaptation decision-making, so that their unique knowledge and&#13;
needs associated with their specific roles in farming tend not to be reflected in those decisions.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA)</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Climate Resilient Technologies</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Climate Change</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Gender Research</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2019-12</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Springer</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>