<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "Biochemical components of wild relatives of chickpea confer resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera"^^ . "Efforts are being made to develop chickpea varieties with resistance to the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera for reducing\r\npesticide use and minimizing the extent of losses due to this pest. However, only low to moderate levels of resistance have\r\nbeen observed in the cultivated chickpea to this polyphagous pest. Hence, it is important to explore wild relatives as resistance\r\nsources to develop insect-resistant cultivars. Therefore, we studied different biochemical components that confer resistance to\r\nH. armigera in a diverse array of wild relatives of chickpea. Accessions belonging to wild relatives of chickpea exhibited high\r\nlevels of resistance to H. armigera as compared to cultivated chickpea genotypes in terms of lower larval survival, pupation\r\nand adult emergence, decreased larval and pupal weights, prolonged larval and pupal developmental periods and reduced\r\nfecundity of the H. armigera when reared on artificial diet impregnated with lyophilized leaf powders. Amounts of proteins\r\nand phenols in different accessions of chickpea wild relatives were significantly and negatively correlated with larval weight,\r\npupation and adult emergence. Phenols showed a negative correlation with pupal weight and fecundity, but positive correlation\r\nwith pupal period. Total soluble sugars showed a negative correlation with larval period, but positive correlation with\r\npupation and pupal weight, while tannins showed a positive correlation with larval weight, pupation and adult emergence.\r\nThe flavonoid compounds such as chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, naringin, 3,4-dihydroxy flavones, quercetin, naringenin,\r\ngenistein, biochanin-A and formononetin that were identified through HPLC fingerprints, exhibited negative effects on survival\r\nand development of H. armigera reared on artificial diet impregnated with lyophilized leaf powders. The wild relatives\r\nwith diverse mechanisms of resistance conferred by different biochemical components can be used as sources of resistance\r\nin chickpea breeding programs to develop cultivars with durable resistance to H. armigera for sustainable crop production."^^ . "2020-04" . . . "14" . "5" . . "Springer"^^ . . . "Arthropod-Plant Interactions (TSI)"^^ . . . "18728855" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "P"^^ . "Rajasekhar"^^ . "P Rajasekhar"^^ . . "H C"^^ . "Sharma"^^ . "H C Sharma"^^ . . "S K"^^ . "Golla"^^ . "S K Golla"^^ . . "J"^^ . "Jaba"^^ . "J Jaba"^^ . . "S P"^^ . "Mishra"^^ . "S P Mishra"^^ . . . . . . "Biochemical components of wild relatives of chickpea confer resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (PDF)"^^ . . . . . "Arthod Plant Interaction.pdf"^^ . . . "Biochemical components of wild relatives of chickpea confer resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "indexcodes.txt"^^ . . "HTML Summary of #11665 \n\nBiochemical components of wild relatives of chickpea confer resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "Pest Management"@en . . . "Chickpea"@en . .