<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Soil Erosion Control and Moisture Conservation Using Contour Ridge Tillage in Bougouni and Koutiala, Southern Mali</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Kalifa</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Traore</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Z B</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Birhanu</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Soil erosion is among the critical environmental constraint for crop production&#13;
in southern Mali. Contour ridge tillage (CRT), a water conservation&#13;
technique had been locally applied since 1990. The objective of this study was&#13;
to determine the effects of CRT compared with farmer conventional agriculture&#13;
practice (NoCRT) on runoff, soil loss, nutrient loss, moisture conservation&#13;
and cereals yields under rainfed conditions in two Southern Mali sites, in&#13;
2016 and 2017 in farmer fields. Measurements were performed on erosion&#13;
plots composed of CRT and NoCRT plots from which water samples were&#13;
collected to determine sedimentation levels, concentration and nutrients&#13;
losses using pairwise comparison. Average runoff coefficient in NoCRT plots&#13;
was 35.62% compared to 19.25% for the CRT plots explaining a runoff reduction&#13;
of 46%. Mean soil losses of 12,095 t·ha−1 and 4970 t·ha−1 were respectively&#13;
measured in NoCRT and CRT plots. Losses in calcium, magnesium and potassium&#13;
nutrients in the NoCRT plots were 80%, 66%, 75% higher compared&#13;
to CRT ones, respectively. Sorghum grain yield was at least two folds higher&#13;
in CRT plots compared to the NoCRT plots. Maize average grain yield was&#13;
87% higher in CRT plots than in the NoCRT. For sustained soil productivity,&#13;
CRT is advocated as a better soil and water management technique than the&#13;
NoCRT one.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Soil</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Water Harvesting</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Water Conservation</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2019-10</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Scientific Research Publishing</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>