<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Photoperiod Response of Annual Wild Species and Cultivated Chickpea on Phenology, Growth, and Yield Traits</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Sharma</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">H D</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Upadhyaya</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Frequent utilization of wild Cicer species in&#13;
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement&#13;
programs, as well as the regeneration of these&#13;
wild species for efficient conservation in genebanks,&#13;
is hindered due to photoperiod and/or&#13;
temperature sensitivity (vernalization). In this&#13;
study, the response to four extended photoperiod&#13;
treatments (15, 18, 21, and 24 h) was&#13;
compared with a control (12 h) for phenology&#13;
and growth in terms of reduction in number&#13;
of days to first flowering, as well as for yieldrelated&#13;
traits in cultivated chickpea and seven&#13;
annual wild Cicer species. The study revealed&#13;
that wild Cicer species required long photoperiods&#13;
(varying from 15 to 18 h) for transition&#13;
from the vegetative to reproductive phase.&#13;
Optimum photoperiods also improved agronomic&#13;
traits such as pod number and seed&#13;
yield per plant. Of the photoperiods studied,&#13;
18 h was the most appropriate photoperiod&#13;
treatment for both reducing the vegetative&#13;
phase and for efficient regeneration in C. reticulatum&#13;
Ladiz. Fifteen hours was the most&#13;
appropriate photoperiod in C. judaicum Boiss.&#13;
and C. yamashitae Kitamura. Both 15 and 18 h&#13;
were the most appropriate photoperiods in C.&#13;
bijugum K.H. Rech. and C. pinnatifidum Jaub.&#13;
&amp; Sp., depending on the objective (15 h for&#13;
regeneration and 18 h for reducing vegetative&#13;
phase). Cicer chorassanicum (Bunge) M. Pop.&#13;
and C. cuneatum Hochst. ex A. Rich. showed&#13;
a weak response to all the extended photoperiod&#13;
treatments. These results contribute to&#13;
enhanced utilization of wild Cicer species for&#13;
chickpea improvement through synchronization&#13;
of flowering facilitating hybridization and&#13;
for efficient regeneration by using speciesspecific&#13;
extended photoperiod treatments.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Chickpea</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Genetics and Genomics</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2019</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Crop Science Society of America</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>