<mets:mets OBJID="eprint_11079" LABEL="Eprints Item" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mets="http://www.loc.gov/METS/" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mets:metsHdr CREATEDATE="2023-07-05T18:09:18Z"><mets:agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION"><mets:name>OAR@ICRISAT</mets:name></mets:agent></mets:metsHdr><mets:dmdSec ID="DMD_eprint_11079_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS"><mets:xmlData><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Photoperiod Response of Annual Wild Species and Cultivated Chickpea on Phenology, Growth, and Yield Traits</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Sharma</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">H D</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Upadhyaya</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Frequent utilization of wild Cicer species in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement programs, as well as the regeneration of these wild species for efficient conservation in genebanks, is hindered due to photoperiod and/or temperature sensitivity (vernalization). In this study, the response to four extended photoperiod treatments (15, 18, 21, and 24 h) was compared with a control (12 h) for phenology and growth in terms of reduction in number of days to first flowering, as well as for yield-related traits in cultivated chickpea and seven annual wild Cicer species. The study revealed that wild Cicer species required long photoperiods (varying from 15 to 18 h) for transition from the vegetative to reproductive phase. Optimum photoperiods also improved agronomic traits such as pod number and seed yield per plant. Of the photoperiods studied, 18 h was the most appropriate photoperiod treatment for both reducing the vegetative phase and for efficient regeneration in C. reticulatum Ladiz. Fifteen hours was the most appropriate photoperiod in C. judaicum Boiss. and C. yamashitae Kitamura. Both 15 and 18 h were the most appropriate photoperiods in C. bijugum K.H. Rech. and C. pinnatifidum Jaub. &amp; Sp., depending on the objective (15 h for regeneration and 18 h for reducing vegetative phase). Cicer chorassanicum (Bunge) M. Pop. and C. cuneatum Hochst. ex A. Rich. showed a weak response to all the extended photoperiod treatments. These results contribute to enhanced utilization of wild Cicer species for chickpea improvement through synchronization of flowering facilitating hybridization and for efficient regeneration by using species-specific extended photoperiod treatments.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Crop Improvement</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Chickpea</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Genetics and Genomics</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2019</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Crop Science Society of America</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:dmdSec><mets:amdSec ID="TMD_eprint_11079"><mets:rightsMD ID="rights_eprint_11079_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS"><mets:xmlData><mods:useAndReproduction>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by its own author:</strong> 
In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic 
metadata, I grant OAR@ICRISAT the right to store 
them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. 
I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I 
understand that OAR@ICRISAT does not assume any 
responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these 
files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their 
copyright on the title page of their work.)</p>

<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by someone other than its 
author:</strong> I hereby declare that the collection of files and 
associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at 
OAR@ICRISAT) is in the public domain. If this is 
not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright 
that distributing these files or metadata may entail.</p>

<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these 
terms.</p>
    </mods:useAndReproduction></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:rightsMD></mets:amdSec><mets:fileSec><mets:fileGrp USE="reference"><mets:file ID="eprint_11079_53603_1" SIZE="935874" OWNERID="http://oar.icrisat.org/11079/1/Photoperiod%20Response.pdf" MIMETYPE="application/pdf"><mets:FLocat LOCTYPE="URL" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://oar.icrisat.org/11079/1/Photoperiod%20Response.pdf"></mets:FLocat></mets:file></mets:fileGrp></mets:fileSec><mets:structMap><mets:div DMDID="DMD_eprint_11079_mods" ADMID="TMD_eprint_11079"><mets:fptr FILEID="eprint_11079_document_53603_1"></mets:fptr></mets:div></mets:structMap></mets:mets>