<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Genomic-enabled prediction model with genotype × environment interaction in elite&#13;
chickpea lines</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">M</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Roorkiwal</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">D</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Jarquin</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">A</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Jain</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">V</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Garg</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S M</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Kale</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">M K</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Singh</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Samineni</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">P M</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Gaur</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">A</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Rathore</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">B</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Chellapilla</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">S</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Tripathi</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">J</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Crossa</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">R K</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Varshney</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Genomic selection (GS) allows safe phenotyping and reduces&#13;
cost and shortening selection cycles. Incorporating of genotype&#13;
× environment (G×E) interactions in genomic prediction models&#13;
improves the predictive ability of lines performance across environments&#13;
and in target environments. Phenotyping data on a set&#13;
of 320 elite chickpea breeding lines on different traits (e.g., plant&#13;
height, days to maturity, and seed yield), from three consecutive&#13;
years for two different treatments at two locations were recorded.&#13;
These lines were genotyped on DArTseq(1.6K) and Genotyping-&#13;
by-Sequencing (GBS; 89K SNPs) platforms. Five different&#13;
models were fitted, four of which included genomic information&#13;
as main effects (baseline model) and/or G×E interactions. Three&#13;
different cross-validation schemes that mimic real scenarios that&#13;
breeders might face on fields were considered to assess the predictive&#13;
ability of the models (CV2: incomplete field trials; CV1:&#13;
newly developed lines; and CV0: new previously untested environments).&#13;
Different prediction models gave different results for&#13;
the different traits; however, some interesting patterns were observed.&#13;
For CV1, analyzing yield seed interaction models improved&#13;
baseline counterparts on an average between 55 and 92% using&#13;
DArT and DArT combined with GBS data, respectively [between&#13;
9 and 112% for all traits]. While for CV2 these improvements varied&#13;
b tween 65 and 102% [between 8 and 130% remaining traits].&#13;
In CV0, no clear advantage was observed considering the interaction&#13;
term. These results suggest that GS models hold potential for&#13;
breeder’s applications on chickpea cultivar improvements.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Chickpea</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Genetics and Genomics</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2017-02</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Conference or Workshop Item</mods:genre></mods:mods>