Policies for African seed enterprise development

Trippa, R and Rohrbach, D D (2001) Policies for African seed enterprise development. Food Policy, 26 (2). pp. 147-161.

[img] PDF
Restricted to ICRISAT users only

Download (65kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The commercial seed sector has been slow to develop in sub-Saharan Africa. The paper examines the major impediments and identifies areas in which seed policies can be strengthened. Seed enterprise development has been hampered by regulatory frameworks that favor parastatal enterprises and that inhibit commercial innovation. In addition, government and donor projects provide large amounts of free or subsidized seed that further discourages seed enterprise development. In addition to regulatory reform and the curtailment of many seed distribution projects, there are other policy changes that need to be implemented. National agricultural research institutes need to invest more resources in promoting their varieties and helping to stimulate commercial seed production. Greater emphasis is required on regional strategies for public plant breeding and private seed marketing. National policies need to strengthen input marketing capacity and infrastructure. Finally, donors, governments and NGOs should shift from trying to encourage village-level commercial seed production and instead strengthen farmers’ capacities to assess new varieties and to be effective consumers of commercial inputs

Item Type: Article
Divisions: UNSPECIFIED
CRPS: UNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywords: Africa; Seed policy; Seed projects; Liberalization
Subjects: Others
Depositing User: Ms K Syamalamba
Date Deposited: 11 Oct 2011 10:59
Last Modified: 31 Dec 2011 05:45
URI: http://oar.icrisat.org/id/eprint/2297
Official URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...
Projects: UNSPECIFIED
Funders: Department for International Development
Acknowledgement: The authors are grateful to the Competitive Research Facility of the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for supporting some of the research presented in this paper. The comments of two anonymous reviewers were also useful. The conclusions are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of ICRISAT, ODI or DFID.
Links:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item